<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://media.rss.com/style.xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[May It Please The Internet]]></title>
    <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet</link>
    <atom:link href="https://media.rss.com/mayitpleasetheinternet/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <description><![CDATA["May It Please The Internet" is a podcast brought to you by RevisionLegal.com, lawyers who represent businesses that make money online.]]></description>
    <generator>RSS.com 2026.401.141116</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:15:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright><![CDATA[Revision Legal 2022]]></copyright>
    <itunes:image href="https://media.rss.com/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220330_060330_8852ba04c3e34e1e5cf4328f87d5f1f1.jpg"/>
    <podcast:guid>25d9930e-0d27-5580-b01a-64f2deaec996</podcast:guid>
    
    <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
    <podcast:license>Revision Legal 2022</podcast:license>
    <itunes:author>John Di Giacomo &amp; Eric Misterovich</itunes:author>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>John Di Giacomo &amp; Eric Misterovich</itunes:name>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:category text="Business">
      <itunes:category text="Entrepreneurship"/>
      <itunes:category text="Management"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <podcast:medium>podcast</podcast:medium>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement In The Wild]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement In The Wild]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this podcast discussion, various trademark infringement cases are examined, each presenting unique elements and legal intricacies. The cases discussed include disputes between the Pike Place Fish Market and the Pike Place Market Authority over the usage of the name "Pike Place Market" in a lease agreement, Rolls-Royce's legal action against HexClad for marketing its cookware products as "the Rolls-Royce of pans," Trader Joe's lawsuit against a labor union called Trader Joe's United for logo and merchandise similarities, and a trademark dispute between Skittles and the cannabis company Turpogs, which used a mark resembling "Skittles."The discussion starts with a Michigan-based client's trademark dispute involving a cannabis company, leading to a demand letter. The potential for licensing the trademark to the cannabis company is considered, but the client opts against it due to concerns about being associated with cannabis. The hosts also speculate about the possibility of larger companies, like Skittles, licensing their brands to cannabis products in the future.The conversation shifts to a case involving Fyre TV, an older streaming service compared to Amazon's Fire TV, resulting in a "reverse confusion" scenario where Amazon's brand overshadows the original mark holder. The hosts emphasize the risks and complexities of trademark law, suggesting that Amazon should have settled the case sooner.Subsequently, the podcast delves into a case involving the Isley Brothers, a band with a history of trademark disputes, where two brothers are suing each other over trademark ownership, highlighting the common issue of intra-band conflicts regarding trademark rights.Lastly, the hosts touch on a Michigan lawsuit concerning the denial of a state trademark registration due to a matching business entity name. They express their belief that this denial is inconsistent with traditional trademark law, as registering a business entity does not constitute a use in commerce, which is a fundamental element of trademark law. They express interest in discussing this case further in a future podcast episode with an attorney handling it. Overall, the podcast provides insights into the complexities and challenges inherent in trademark law through the examination of these diverse cases."May It Please The Internet" is brought by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"><strong>Revision Legal</strong></a>. ]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/1149180</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/1149180/mayitpleasetheinternet/2023_09_30_15_20_13_e321faee-c774-43e8-a551-9049e6c1f752.mp3" length="35458311" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c5fa9b9-1389-4dfe-a889-3b7e103ac90e</guid>
      <itunes:duration>2216</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>23</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 15:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/1149180/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Amazon Aggregator Troubles Continue]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Amazon Aggregator Troubles Continue]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[This episode discusses the troubles faced by Amazon aggregators, which are companies that buy and manage multiple Amazon businesses. These aggregators experienced a boom in 2020, with high multiples and easy access to funding. However, various factors, such as supply chain issues, rising shipping costs, and operational challenges, have led to their difficulties. Many aggregators used deferred payment structures in their deals, making it hard for sellers to get paid when issues arose. Private equity firms provided financing to these aggregators, but as the market changed and interest rates increased, the money dried up, leading to defaults and restructuring. Some aggregators still operate, but they are more focused and cautious in their approach. The podcast advises sellers to seek legal counsel and maintain communication with aggregators if they face payment issues.<strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong><em> is a podcast brought by </em><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"><strong><em>Revision Legal</em></strong></a><em>. </em>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/1138094</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/1138094/mayitpleasetheinternet/2023_09_22_19_07_34_b2f88fbc-cd18-49a9-af41-abb5f22e5ea7.mp3" length="24398275" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c13d4cdd-9f70-42b6-a77b-b9eb0b8b0d73</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1524</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>22</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 19:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/1138094/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Legal Considerations For Video Game Development]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Legal Considerations For Video Game Development]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[John Di Giacomo and Eric Misterovich of Revision Legal discuss the legal considerations that game developers should keep in mind. They start by emphasizing the importance of entity formation and corporate governance, highlighting the need to formalize ownership and establish a proper operating agreement to avoid future complications. They share a cautionary tale of an indie developer who faced issues with copyright rights due to the absence of clear ownership documentation.Moving on, they delve into the significance of publishing, licensing, and distribution deals for game developers. They stress the need for developers to understand the extent of control they may be giving up and thoroughly review contracts to ensure their rights are protected. They emphasize the value of involving an attorney in negotiations to avoid unfavorable terms or misunderstandings, recounting instances where developers suffered financially due to inadequate legal representation.Legal compliance and regulation also come into play as the hosts discuss the evolving landscape of regulations surrounding the games industry. They mention the potential for lawsuits and class action suits if developers fail to comply with relevant laws and regulations, urging developers to proactively ensure compliance to avoid legal challenges.The podcast concludes with a discussion on the importance of employment practices and policies within game development studios. They emphasize the need for proper agreements, clear rights assignments, and comprehensive employment policies to prevent controversies such as harassment allegations, overwork, or disrespectful management. They stress the legal consequences of such issues and advocate for seeking legal advice to mitigate risks.Overall, this podcast episode provides valuable insights into the legal considerations that game developers should address, highlighting the potential pitfalls and the importance of legal support throughout the development process.May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought by RevisionLegal.com]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/982795</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/982795/mayitpleasetheinternet/2023_06_06_15_51_55_8a177f7c-309f-4ee9-9a78-29a0dda307ba.mp3" length="21729606" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b4c8d739-cfba-41d0-9554-bd204d8fa131</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1358</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>21</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 15:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <itunes:image href="https://media.rss.com/mayitpleasetheinternet/ep_cover_20230606_030639_668dc2eaef54872b533bc3eb29d5efa2.jpg"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/982795/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission Comes Calling]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission Comes Calling]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/john/">John Di Giacomo</a> and <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/eric/">Eric Misterovich</a> discuss the <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/">Federal Trade Commission</a> (FTC) and recent enforcement actions taken by the FTC. They explain that the FTC is a government watchdog that protects consumers from unfair and deceptive acts in business. The FTC has broad regulatory and enforcement authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair methods of competition and unfair and deceptive acts or practices that affect commerce.They highlight that businesses need to be cautious about how they portray their goods or services online and avoid crossing the line into unfair or deceptive practices. The FTC can enforce its rules through strong monetary fines and other measures to shut down businesses engaging in wrongful activities.They discuss examples of recent enforcement actions, including cases related to lead generation services provided by Angie's List and Home Advisor, deceptive claims by TurboTax regarding free tax filing, and review manipulation by Fashion Nova. These cases demonstrate the FTC's efforts to hold businesses accountable for misleading practices.John and Eric emphasize that businesses of all sizes can be targeted by the FTC, and even if a business falls outside the FTC's scope, state-level regulations may still apply. They highlight the importance of compliance and the potential consequences businesses may face if they engage in deceptive acts or false advertising.They also mention that the FTC's enforcement actions can benefit consumers and level the playing field in the marketplace. Despite the perception of toxicity surrounding government actions, they appreciate the role of regulatory bodies in policing deceptive practices and protecting everyone equally.]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/968896</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/968896/mayitpleasetheinternet/2023_05_26_14_48_12_988fbdb3-a6b4-4f4a-b5a2-b0dfd19b805d.mp3" length="30171963" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc4a2a10-8ea3-4e4c-b63b-13367fae5e14</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1885</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>20</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 15:02:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <itunes:image href="https://media.rss.com/mayitpleasetheinternet/ep_cover_20230526_020539_db36f12cc2f7a5a93440bf4a57e075a5.jpg"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/968896/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Liability and Accountability in AI]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Liability and Accountability in AI]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[This podcast episode discusses the law applicable to artificial intelligence (AI), which is increasingly being used in various industries and applications. ChatGPT, a large language model, is introduced as an example of a neural network that can generate text, but sometimes produces false information. Other examples of AI discussed are Dall-E 2, Stable Diffusion, and Midjourney, which can create images from textual descriptions. The podcast also covers the legal frameworks that apply to AI, including intellectual property law, contract law, tort law, and criminal law. The issues surrounding intellectual property protection for AI, liability of AI systems for harm caused, and the current state of regulation of AI in different jurisdictions are also discussed. The importance of understanding the legal landscape surrounding AI is emphasized given its increasing use and potential impact on various aspects of society. <strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong> is a podcast by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"><strong>RevisionLegal.com</strong></a>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/907298</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/907298/mayitpleasetheinternet/2023_04_13_23_57_42_202cdcba-7064-4659-9453-b9c45c694118.mp3" length="28557805" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">03edcf26-1b6b-4060-96ac-1c3c5d199986</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1784</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/907298/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Five Ways To Protect Your Content Site]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Five Ways To Protect Your Content Site]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this episode of May It Please The Internet, <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/john/">John Di Giacomo</a> and <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/eric/">Eric Misterovich</a> talk about content sites, and five particular ways that you can protect them. Content sites are websites with very niche topics, which produce rich and expert content in a specific area. Listen in as John and Eric discuss DMCA compliance, independent contractors, and trademarks &amp; photographs as well as many other crucial factors involved in protecting your content site.•••May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"><strong>RevisionLegal.com</strong></a>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/874152</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/874152/mayitpleasetheinternet/2023_03_20_19_14_51_9a28bdef-8deb-4f89-b452-f64758ed730d.mp3" length="37177377" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4b1fae9-09ae-40cf-896b-305be253ca52</guid>
      <itunes:duration>2323</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 19:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/874152/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Open Game License 1.1 D&D Clashes with Creators Over IP]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Open Game License 1.1 D&D Clashes with Creators Over IP]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on May It Please the Internet, <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/john/">John</a> is joined by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/christopher/"><strong>Chris Carroll</strong></a> to discuss the Open Gaming License, D&amp;D, Wizards of the Coast, and what you can &amp; can’t do with IP Properties. Listen in as they talk about the history of D&amp;D, first publishing, and the Satanic Panic, as well as the prior license, Copyright Law and  how it covers content.</p><p><strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong> is a podcast brought to you by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"><strong>Revision Legal</strong></a></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/795519</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/795519/mayitpleasetheinternet/2023_01_25_22_14_03_2a1b0982-a2fe-41d9-b329-d22266e44205.mp3" length="32394252" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8431a42f-a85c-4aeb-8466-c39539dcd0b9</guid>
      <itunes:duration>2024</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:18:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/795519/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[7 Figure Store Legal Checklist]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[7 Figure Store Legal Checklist]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Intro</p><ul><li><p>Lots of questions about start ups, to us, these are not all that interesting. Reality is a true start up is going to do the bare minimum to get going. Ownership agreements between the founders are probably the most important, after that, it is completely dependent on what the business can afford.</p></li><li><p>More interesting is to open the hood on businesses that have been around. What should you have in place if you have been around for 3, 5, 10 years. What could be considered a luxury for a start up can become an absolute need for a more mature business</p></li><li><p>No business is perfect, you won’t have all of these</p></li><li><p>But end of the year is approaching, it is time to pull out that dusty list of legal needs and start making plans to get things done</p><ol><li><p>Organizational Structure</p></li></ol><p>a. Internal corporate documents (bylaws/shareholder agreement/operating agreement)</p></li></ul><p>i. Clear outline on ownership/managers</p><p>ii. Buy/sell agreements</p><p>b. Relations with investors</p><p>You should be able to clearly, and without question, answer:</p><ul><li><p>all questions about your cap table, capital accounts, rights of first refusals, and your complete org structure</p></li><li><p>know your (and other owners) rights about selling</p></li><li><p>what happens if people die, divorce</p></li><li><p>key man insurance (and how to distribute the money)</p></li></ul><p>If you exit, this must be 100% clear or it will cause problems.</p><p>2. Contracts</p><p>a. Employment agreement</p><p>i. Non-compete</p><p>ii. Confidentiality</p><p>iii. Work for hire</p><p>b. Independent contractor agreements</p><p>i. Work for hire</p><p>c. Phantom stock / incentive agreements</p><p>d. Employee handbooks</p><p>i. Workplace policies (time off, sick leave, benefits, etc)</p><p>e. Service agreements (how you get paid)</p><p>f. Real terms of use</p><p>g. Real privacy policy</p><p>h. Real copyright policy (copyright registered agent)</p><p>i. Manufacturing agreements</p><p>j. Insurance</p><p>ii. Property/personal property</p><p>iii. Key man</p><p>iv. health</p><p>You should have organized documents that all have signatures. You will need to produce all of these documents in an exit.</p><p>3. IP</p><p>a. Trademark</p><p>i. Federal/state registrations</p><p>ii. Process to clear names before investment</p><p>iii. Trusted counsel</p><p>iv. Make sure registrations are owned by the correct entity</p><p>v. International trademarks</p><p>1.US only good for US</p><p>2.Take advantage of Madrid</p><p>3. File in “first to file” countries - china</p><p>b. Copyright</p><p>i. Understanding what can/should be registered</p><ol><li><p>Industry specific but advantages for all</p><p>c. Patent</p></li></ol><p>i. Knowing basics of when/how to act if you want to seek patent protection (or at least who to ask)</p><p>ii. Contracts with employees help to make sure you have all rights</p><p>d. Trade secrets</p><p>i. What they are</p><p>ii. How you maintain trade secrets</p><p>You should be able to:</p><ul><li><p>Explain and document all cases all alleged infringement on your IP and threats against you</p></li><li><p>Know where the business could invest in more IP protections</p></li><li><p>Have a domain portfolio of domains registered for your brand, including defensive registrations to cover typos or even gripe site type domains</p><ol><li><p>Taxes</p><p>a. Understand tax structure, tax planning</p></li></ol></li></ul><p>i. What states for sales tax – nexus</p><p>b. Trusted CPA</p><p>c. Paying quarterly</p><p>d. Taking advantage of tax laws</p><p>i. Cars</p><p>ii. Spouses / kids</p><p>e. Not trying to nickel and dime, just do it right</p><ol><li><p>Accounting</p><p>a. Clean books</p></li></ol>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/725202</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/725202/mayitpleasetheinternet/2022_11_30_21_40_45_31a8e342-f9f1-4eb6-9e44-88386a4ff9f9.mp3" length="51059483" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be47c0b2-d3c1-4249-91d2-cd52440e1707</guid>
      <itunes:duration>2127</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <itunes:image href="https://media.rss.com/mayitpleasetheinternet/ep_cover_20221130_091141_ac73088bcc2a60acd036c61d7c15a6b5.jpg"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/725202/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[ADA Website Lawsuits - Whats the Deal?]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[ADA Website Lawsuits - Whats the Deal?]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/john/"><strong>John Di Giacomo</strong></a> and <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/eric/"><strong>Eric Misterovich</strong></a> dive into the issues surrounding lawsuits over the <a href="https://adata.org/learn-about-ada">Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)</a> and ecommerce websites.</p><ul><li><p>Intro</p></li><li><p>World of scammy lawsuits is nothing new, but there is a popular trend impacting ecomm store owners: lawsuits claiming websites are not ADA compliant for the visually impaired</p></li><li><p>Before we dive into this topic, let’s visit the history of shitty lawsuits attorneys/companies file in the online space</p><ul><li><p>copyright trolls</p><ul><li><p>stock photo companies looking for unauthorized uses</p></li><li><p>Freeplay music</p><ul><li><p>Confusing on what license you actually have / synch license</p></li></ul></li><li><p>bit torrent lawsuits on porn</p><ul><li><p>Prenda Law</p><ul><li><p>the CD CA called it a :porno-trolling collective” whose business model relied “on deception” and resembled a racketeering enterprise</p></li><li><p>they basically uploaded porn to bit torrent networks then threatened to sue anyone that downloaded it, or that had their IP address implicated</p></li><li><p>there was no real plaintiff</p></li><li><p>threatened public exposure of the Ds downloading porn and would settle for $4,000, or a bit less than the price of defense</p></li><li><p>always one named defendant that was basically in on it</p></li><li><p>Steele got 5 years</p></li><li><p>Hansmeier got 14 years</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Always looking for a quick settlement</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><p>ADA Lawsuits</p><ul><li><p>ADA/state law, in general, says that all persons are entitled to full and equal accommodations in all business establishments”</p></li><li><p>These all follow a relatively similar pattern</p></li><li><p>A plaintiff files suit on behalf of a class arguing that the defendants website cannot be operated by the plaintiff, who is visually impaired</p></li><li><p>They ask for an extreme amount of money, $30-50,000</p></li><li><p>But they are willing to settle for far less, often times under 10,000</p></li></ul></li></ul><p> </p><ul><li><p>What do these plaintiff have to prove?</p><ul><li><p>These plaintiffs must have “bona fide intent” to use the D’s services</p><ul><li><p>This leads to some ridiculous examples of blind people wanting to buy guns, cars, etc</p></li></ul></li><li><p>There was also a defense as to whether the ADA applied to online businesses, or whether a “brick and mortar” store only fell within the ADA’s “public accommodation” language</p><ul><li><p>This used to be somewhat up in the air</p></li><li><p>But in August 2022, a CA COA ruled that the CA ADA law, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, did not apply to websites.</p></li><li><p>This practically killed ADA cases in CA, but not in other states (NY, PA, etc).</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p> </p><ul><li><p>What should store owners do</p><ul><li><p>WCAG 2.1 standards</p><ul><li><p>People can use screen readers and obtain a phone number to call</p></li><li><p>Contrast in text</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Not ignore lawsuits</p></li></ul></li></ul>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/701522</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/701522/mayitpleasetheinternet/2022_11_18_22_16_01_47f3c8e8-114d-4d78-b8c0-04c541e00c20.mp3" length="39569576" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b09ae4a7-1fee-477b-95b5-18811db371db</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1648</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 22:19:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/701522/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Work For Hire Agreements and Assignment Clauses]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Work For Hire Agreements and Assignment Clauses]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong>, <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/john/">John Di Giacomo</a> and <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/eric/">Eric Misterovich</a> talk about work for higher agreements and assignment clauses and how you get stuff from one place to another when you're working with contractors and employees in the context of intellectual property law. It can be a problem in a business sale. It has killed deals and cannot be stressed enough how important this type of stuff is. There are very few things that will kill an M&amp;A deal in the e-commerce space and not having the IP rights is like point number one.</p><p>•</p><p>•</p><p>•</p><p><strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong> is a podcast brought to you by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"><strong>Revision Legal</strong></a>.</p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/671148</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/671148/mayitpleasetheinternet/2022_10_26_03_29_37_e95a0f99-cd5c-4d30-8665-6b0b49d16fbf.mp3" length="20790252" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fdeb7f12-aa70-4ea2-b3d3-2ac19212fd9d</guid>
      <itunes:duration>866</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 03:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/671148/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Taylor Swift & Taylor's Version: An Intro to Copyright Law]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Taylor Swift & Taylor's Version: An Intro to Copyright Law]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode focuses on <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/services/copyright/"><em>Copyright law</em></a> in music and entertainment. <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/john/">John</a> and <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/eric/">Eric</a> discuss <a href="https://www.taylorswift.com/">Taylor Swift</a>'s music and the significance of "<a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/22278732/taylor-swift-re-recording-fearless-love-story-master-rights-scooter-braun">Taylor's Version</a>" on download and streaming platforms. There is also some time dedicated to John's love of the <a href="https://www.psychopathicrecords.com/artists">Insane Clown Posse</a>.</p><p><strong>First – intro into copyright law – few quick definitions then pull it together</strong></p><ul><li><p>What is a copyright – type of IP that protects original works of authorship the moment an author fixes the work in a tangible medium of expression.</p></li><li><p>What is a work – picture, movie, musical recording, book, architecture, code, etc</p></li><li><p>What are copyright rights –</p><ul><li><p>Reproduce the work</p></li><li><p>Distribute copies of the work</p></li><li><p>Perform the work publicly</p></li><li><p>Make derivative work</p></li><li><p>Perform copyrighted sound recordings by means of a digital audio transmission</p></li><li><p>Display the work</p><ul><li><p>Explain copyright as bundle of sticks</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Bring it all together.</p></li></ul><p><strong>Second, copyrights in music/albums</strong></p><ul><li><p>There are always two copyrights at issue: the music itself/lyrics and the musical recording.</p><ul><li><p>Artist usually owns the music/lyrics</p></li><li><p>Record label owns the recording</p><ul><li><p>Gives both rights in the music, need both approval for licensing, etc</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>Now to Taylor</strong></p><ul><li><p>Big Machine Records owned Taylor’s musical recordings</p></li><li><p>That entity was sold to Scooter Braun, manager of many famous groups</p></li><li><p>He sold it to a private equity firm, estimates are $300 million</p><ul><li><p>This would give this PE firm rights to control that music</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Taylor didn’t like this and said fuck you</p></li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>Contract Law</strong></p><ul><li><p>Taylor’s contracts with Big Machine Records gave her re-recording rights after 2 years.</p></li><li><p>So this allows her to re-record the songs</p></li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>But isn’t that infringing on the PE firm’s rights?</strong></p><ul><li><p>NO</p></li><li><p>Copyright law, specifically 17 USC 114</p><ul><li><p>The exclusive rights of the owner of copyright in a sound recording under clauses (1) and (2) of section 106 do not extend to the making or duplication of another sound recording that consists entirely of an independent fixation of other sounds, even though such sounds imitate or simulate those in the copyrighted sound recording. </p></li></ul></li><li><p>So this means Taylor can make the same song (she owns the music and lyrics) and record it and it is NOT infringement</p></li><li><p>And that is exactly she did. She re-recorded 4 albums and you will see they are all called “Taylor’s Version” on Spotify/Apple music</p></li><li><p>Boss move</p></li></ul><p>May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"><strong>REVISIONLEGAL.com</strong></a></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/654281</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/654281/mayitpleasetheinternet/2022_10_13_03_42_17_85207a15-04e0-4934-89c0-3115778fd1fc.mp3" length="15364933" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d4383764-d6b7-4d20-8ae1-505b95026899</guid>
      <itunes:duration>960</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/654281/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Down Goes Thotsbay]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Down Goes Thotsbay]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/john/">John Di Giacomo</a> and <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/eric/">Eric Misterovich</a> share how <strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">Revision Legal</a></strong> took down thotsbay.com, the process, the push back, and the positive results.</p><p><strong>Short Story:</strong> Through a copyright infringement lawsuit, we were able to have a haven for leaked paid adult content taken down.</p><ul><li><p>What was Thotsbay?</p><ul><li><p>Explanation of forums</p></li><li><p>How people gained “points” upvotes etc</p></li><li><p>Number of people impacted by this website – hundreds of thousands of users</p></li></ul></li><li><p>What we did</p><ul><li><p>Filed a lawsuit in the ND IL for copyright infringement</p></li><li><p>The case for copyright infringement is very clear</p></li><li><p>We conduct discovery</p><ul><li><p>Subpoenas to ad networks, paypal, registrars</p></li><li><p>We are able to find the people behind the websites, but they reside overseas</p></li><li><p>Not able to freeze a substantial amount of money, they switched into only accepting bitcoin shortly after the lawsuit began</p></li></ul></li><li><p>We obtain a default judgment</p><ul><li><p>That judgment requires third parties to act</p></li><li><p>This required us to enforce the judgment with Tucows / Verisign</p></li><li><p>Shortly thereafter, the site moved to a specific country code registrar outside the US, but able to convince them to shut down the site as well</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>What happened next</p><ul><li><p>Subscription bomb, other bad actions</p></li><li><p>Sites give up, but we keep getting notices that the site is back, not entirely clear at this point</p></li><li><p>Ton of support from those impacted, positive end</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Next steps          </p><ul><li><p>Fight isn’t over</p></li><li><p>Continuing our investigation</p></li><li><p>Other sites are in the cross hairs</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong><em>May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought by RevisionLegal.com, lawyers who represent businesses who make money online.</em></strong> </p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/633220</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/633220/mayitpleasetheinternet/2022_09_27_04_44_47_359f1cbe-6548-4341-a550-c3695cc27695.mp3" length="20201139" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">882e1e15-d10a-456c-9faa-a5015fc51fce</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1262</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <itunes:image href="https://media.rss.com/mayitpleasetheinternet/ep_cover_20220927_040916_1615ff6ce8188601cbc978128317116e.jpg"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/633220/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[How Do I Talk To An Attorney, How Do I Hire An Attorney, and What Should I Be Asking?]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[How Do I Talk To An Attorney, How Do I Hire An Attorney, and What Should I Be Asking?]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/christopher/">Christopher Carol</a>, </strong>Attorney at Revision Legal joins <strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/about/eric/">Eric Misterovich</a></strong> to talk about taking the stress away from hiring an attorney. They cover how to know it's time to seek legal assistance, how to go about hiring an attorney, what to ask during the initial meeting, and making your decision. In this episode you will learn how to avoid surprises, gauge experience and responsiveness, and build mutual trust with reasonable expectations.</p><p>May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought by <strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/627122</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/627122/mayitpleasetheinternet/2022_09_22_03_45_31_13c5283b-664f-4f5b-9263-4452f445340a.mp3" length="27148457" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec763cb1-7085-49a7-91b2-a89ac9d4969e</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1696</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 03:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/627122/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Is Your eCommerce Business Ready for In-House Counsel?]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Is Your eCommerce Business Ready for In-House Counsel?]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Eric is joined by Chris Carol, Associate Attorney at Revision Legal. Chris shares his prior experience as in-house corporate legal counsel for a variety of different entrepreneurs throughout his career and how he applies this to his work with Revision Legal. </p><p><strong><em>Is Your E-commerce Business Ready for In-House Counsel?</em></strong> </p><p>Episode Outline:</p><p>Intro</p><p>• Welcome to May it Please the Internet </p><p>• Intro to Chris </p><p>   ◦ Chris joined in 2021, previous experience working in-house </p><p>   ◦ Chris, explain who you are, past experience in general terms, etc. </p><p>• Topic </p><p>   ◦ Here today to talk about whether your eCommerce business is ready for in-house counsel </p><p>   ◦ What is in-house counsel and what do they do? </p><p>       ▪ Oversight over legal issues for entire business </p><p>              • Handle certain issues for the business </p><p>                    ◦ Internal corporate matters </p><p>                    ◦ Contracting </p><p>                    ◦ Some employment </p><p>                    ◦ Regulatory / licensing issues </p><p>              • Outsource and work with outside counsel for other matters </p><p>                    ◦ Litigation </p><p>                    ◦ IP </p><p>                    ◦ Employment </p><p>                    ◦ Tax </p><p>                    ◦ Property </p><p>       ▪ Quasi-business advisor </p><p>              • Identify risk </p><p>              • Ask tough questions </p><p>              • Generally kill dreams (but just playing devil’s advocate) </p><p>       ▪ The main point is that you have someone with legal training in the room, part of the planning process, and hearing the input/issues raised by various departments within the company </p><p>                    ◦ Different types of “in-house” counsel </p><p>       ▪ Standard is hiring an attorney and putting them on the payroll </p><p>              • This is right for certain types of businesses </p><p>                    ◦ VC firm, highly regulated industries, or big enough where legal is a constant issue </p><p>       ▪ But “in house” can be a good fit even for businesses that don’t fall into those categories, but it would be at a smaller scale </p><p>              • Fractional in-house or “outsourced in-house” </p><p>                    ◦ What it really means is having a regular and constant legal voice in the business, on whatever scale makes sense </p><p>                    ◦ We do this in a number of ways </p><p>       ▪ Attend certain meetings </p><p>       ▪ Regular weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly meetings </p><p>       ▪ Being a part of a company’s Teams/ Slack channel </p><p>       ▪ Attend company retreats </p><p>              • What are the benefits? </p><p>                    ◦ We touched on this already, but its about having that voice in the room</p><p>                    ◦ Yes, we may identify more problems than a true risk-taker, but we can also save time </p><p>       ▪ If you come up with a plan for doing a massive online sweepstakes as a central marketing effort, spend a bunch of time and money, then at the last minute say, we need to run this by legal, you may have wasted a bunch of time </p><p>       ▪ Of course cost is a concern, but in my experience, the problem with legal fees is usually the unpredictable nature, not the cost itself. </p><p>       ▪ If you can find a predictable budget, even flat fees, then this can work </p><p>       ▪ Wrap it up </p><p>              • In house essential for some businesses </p><p>              • Can benefit all businesses and the cost can be made predictable </p><p>              • Having that different voice in the room can save time </p><p><strong><em>May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">REVISIONLEGAL.COM</a></em></strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/607493</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/607493/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220906_030914_95a8c4106537bc9fd3f2e59e79acd4c8.mp3" length="23781377" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c16f6501-d63e-47ed-8fce-6ea80f577461</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1487</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 04:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <itunes:image href="https://media.rss.com/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220906_030938_0c2678e05fe617d11d75524875751a21.jpg"/>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/607493/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Handling Legal Issues On Amazon]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Handling Legal Issues On Amazon]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Handling Legal Problems on Amazon</strong></p><ol><li><p><strong>Actions by Amazon competitors</strong></p><ol><li><p>Describe the problem</p></li><li><p>Specific types of problems</p><ol><li><p>False infringement notices</p></li><li><p>False re-categorization</p></li><li><p>Hijacking listings</p></li></ol></li><li><p>How to handle them</p><ol><li><p>Demand letters</p></li><li><p>Litigation</p><ol><li><p>Types of claims</p><ol><li><p>Abuse of the DMCA</p></li><li><p>Tortious interference</p></li><li><p>Unfair competition/deceptive trade practices</p></li></ol></li></ol></li></ol></li></ol></li><li><p><strong>Actions involving Amazon</strong></p><ol><li><p>Describe the problem</p></li><li><p>Specific types of problems</p><ol><li><p>Suspensions</p></li><li><p>Terminations</p></li><li><p>IP infringement</p></li></ol></li><li><p>How to handle them</p><ol><li><p>Arbitration under BSA</p></li><li><p>Litigation for IP claims</p></li></ol></li></ol></li></ol><p><strong><em>"May It Please The Internet" is a podcast brought to you by: <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">Revision Legal</a></em></strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/495427</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/495427/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220522_090515_66e8c7c348295a138faaea4499a5670e.mp3" length="20533416" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ef5f2015-eb8f-4eab-a18d-5954efebcda3</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1284</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 07:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/495427/transcript" type="text/plain"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Talking Trademarks – 5 Things Every Business Owner Should Know]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Talking Trademarks – 5 Things Every Business Owner Should Know]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Talking Trademarks – 5 Things Every Business Owner Should Know</strong></p><p> </p><p><strong>1. What are Trademarks?</strong></p><p> </p><p>The term “<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&amp;height=800&amp;iframe=true&amp;def_id=15-USC-753641009-1913738695&amp;term_occur=999&amp;term_src=title:15:chapter:22:subchapter:III:section:1127">trademark</a>” includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof—</p><p>(1) used by a <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&amp;height=800&amp;iframe=true&amp;def_id=15-USC-991716523-1913738695&amp;term_occur=999&amp;term_src=title:15:chapter:22:subchapter:III:section:1127">person</a>, or</p><p>(2) which a <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&amp;height=800&amp;iframe=true&amp;def_id=15-USC-991716523-1913738695&amp;term_occur=999&amp;term_src=title:15:chapter:22:subchapter:III:section:1127">person</a> has a bona fide intention to<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&amp;height=800&amp;iframe=true&amp;def_id=15-USC-85351-1913738695&amp;term_occur=999&amp;term_src="> use </a>in <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&amp;height=800&amp;iframe=true&amp;def_id=15-USC-602412325-1913738695&amp;term_occur=999&amp;term_src=title:15:chapter:22:subchapter:III:section:1127">commerce</a> and applies to register on the principal register established by this chapter,</p><p>to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown.</p><p><strong>2. What is the Purpose of Trademarks?</strong></p><ul><li><p>Protect consumers</p><p>- Coffee example</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Value to rights holder</p></li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>3. Are some Trademarks Better than Others?</strong></p><ul><li><p>Yes, not all created equal</p></li></ul><p>i.      Fanciful</p><p>ii.      Arbitrary</p><p>iii.      Suggestive</p><p>iv.      Descriptive</p><ul><li><p>Things to avoid</p></li></ul><p>i.      descriptive</p><p>ii.      geography</p><p>iii.      surnames</p><p>iv.      foreign languages</p><p> </p><p><strong>4. How Close is too Close to Another Trademark</strong></p><ul><li><p>Need to understand likelihood of confusion test</p></li><li><p>Very flexible</p></li><li><p>Not strict</p></li><li><p>How close are the two marks - Slight change in spelling not enough</p></li><li><p>How close are the Goods/services, sophistication of consumer, trade channels, etc</p></li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>5. Do I Need to Register a Trademark to have one?</strong></p><ul><li><p>NO</p></li><li><p>Use in commerce</p></li><li><p>Benefits of registration</p></li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>Bonus – why hire an attorney for a TM?</strong></p><ul><li><p>Single filings, with some study, not the end of the world to do yourself</p></li><li><p>But these rights last forever (in theory), if there is any complexity at all, get advice</p></li><li><p>Attorneys can help with future plans, contingent plans, scope of your registrations, and practical advise</p></li><li><p>Worthy investment</p></li></ul><p><strong><em>"May It Please The Internet"</em></strong><em> is a podcast brought to you by: </em><strong><em><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></em></strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/490523</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/490523/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220518_030511_966f2ab5f6d7ec69cc7a5a9ef79eed82.mp3" length="25359173" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a18dc69b-2899-4a65-8117-a241562352bc</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1585</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 03:37:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/490523/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[APA Representations and Warranties]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[APA Representations and Warranties]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>APA Series</strong></p><ul><li><p>Reps and Warranties</p><ul><li><p>What are they – Promises</p><ul><li><p>General overview</p></li><li><p>Walk through some examples</p></li><li><p>How people should be reviewing these</p></li><li><p>What happens if they are not true</p><ul><li><p>Disclosure schedules!</p><ul><li><p>What are these</p></li><li><p>How do they work</p></li><li><p>What do they look like</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>What happens if you breach these promises</p><ul><li><p>Explain connection to indemnification</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Fundamental v general reps</p></li><li><p>Baskets and caps</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>Parting Shot</strong></p><ul><li><p>Get your operating agreement done. Do it. Make it a priority. You may not use it, but its nice to have something in place.</p></li></ul><p><strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong><em> is a podcast brought to you by </em><strong><em><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></em></strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/"> </a></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/483127</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/483127/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220511_030548_4c14d570f732b82152d44a5d06684d16.mp3" length="26389025" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6895b35f-c7a6-4474-8569-7b94abaf238e</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1650</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 03:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/483127/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[How to Think About Litigation]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[How to Think About Litigation]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>How to Think About Litigation</strong></p><ul><li><p>Had a client ask me, will I win? And it just made me think about the incredible disconnect between what people think a lawsuit is about and what a lawsuit it really about.</p></li><li><p>Basics of litigation – big picture</p><ul><li><p>Long, slow, expensive</p></li><li><p>Not great way to solve a problem</p></li><li><p>Either a last resort or a problem so big that it cannot wait or injunctive relief</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Outside pressures play a big role</p><ul><li><p>Loss of profits, waiting on money, financing, online listings, etc.</p></li><li><p>Personal or business decisions, selling the business, new projects, new hires, etc.</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Procedure</p><ul><li><p>Complaint, summons</p></li><li><p>Answer/MTD</p><ul><li><p>Creating factual issues good for P bad for D</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Discovery</p></li><li><p>Summary J</p></li><li><p>Trial</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Collections</p></li><li><p>So the question is not “will I win”</p><ul><li><p>Its balancing all of these factors, determining whether it is worth the investment, the odds of success, the consequences of losing, peace of mind, loss of production, etc</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em> is a podcast brought to you by: <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/475323</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/475323/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220505_100542_26718fccecc4945623d60d21fc600e94.mp3" length="36517012" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ea4d24e-4324-48e5-a31a-3eb36c72ee0e</guid>
      <itunes:duration>2283</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 04:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/475323/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Purchase Price and Closing (APA part 2)]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Purchase Price and Closing (APA part 2)]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mini-APA Series: Purchase Price and Closing</strong></p><p>Last week, we covered the basics what exactly is an APA; how is it different than equity, the parties to the agreement, what you are selling, what you are not selling.</p><p>This week we want to talk about the fun stuff: <em><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/services/corporate/buying-and-selling/">Purchase Price and Closing</a></em></p><p><strong>Purchase Price</strong></p><ul><li><p>Different ways to describe it, one number, one number plus other payments later, a multiple of SDE, etc.</p></li><li><p>Get into SDE in a bit</p></li><li><p>First want to make sure you confirm the number is correct and when does it get paid</p><ul><li><p>Escrow/release of escrow</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Deferred payments</p><ul><li><p>Hold back</p></li><li><p>Deferred Payment</p></li><li><p>Stabilization payments</p></li><li><p>Earn Out Payments</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Other deferred payment issues</p><ul><li><p>When are deferred payments made?</p></li><li><p>Performance based Earn out payments </p><ul><li><p>What is the calculation</p></li><li><p>Are there caps on things like operational overhead?</p></li><li><p>Do you have access to books and records to confirm performance targets</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Can these be used for set off?</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Inventory Payment</strong></p><ul><li><p>When is this paid</p><ul><li><p>All types of options</p><ul><li><p>Paid in full</p></li><li><p>% of estimate then true up</p></li><li><p>Consignment</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Inventory estimate/reconciliation process</p><ul><li><p>Seller estimates pre closing</p></li><li><p>Buyer determines final post closing</p></li><li><p>Must have ability to object to post closing</p></li><li><p>When is reconciled amount paid</p></li><li><p>Net working capital adjustments </p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Parting Shot</strong> – If you are about to be in a lawsuit, or maybe in a lawsuit, don’t email everyone in the world about it. Those are all discoverable. If a lawsuit is possible, phone calls only. Limit emails to attorneys. Don’t forward your attorney’s emails to other people!</p><p>***<strong><em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong> is a podcast brought to you by <strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></strong>, lawyers who represent businesses who make money online. </p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/465238</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/465238/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220424_020425_5a3814b90dd0d0d164e08b9cdfd8367d.mp3" length="23889211" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed8b3d74-c19c-4ef4-8d93-8fb278b9317e</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1493</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 04:00:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/465238/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Stolen Digital Assets]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Stolen Digital Assets]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stolen Digital Assets!</strong></p><ul><li><p>Opening: general chat about digital assets, how they can move, how they can be stolen, people forgetting bitcoin wallet passwords, etc.</p></li><li><p>This used to be about domain name</p><ul><li><p>Revision Legal past experience in <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/services/litigation/">litigating stolen domain name </a>issues</p><ul><li><p>ACPA/CFAA/UDRP</p></li><li><p>Damages</p></li><li><p>Procedure/Jurisdiction</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Continuing the NFT train – stolen NFT is the newest rage</p><ul><li><p>Recent lawsuit – Armijo v OpenSea and Yuga Labs (BAYC) – District of NV</p><ul><li><p>FACTS</p><ul><li><p>Nov 2021, Jan 2022, P bought 3 BAYC/MAYC for total of about 80 ETH (about 300k)</p></li><li><p>Feb 2022, he wants to trade the MAYC for some “Cool Cats” NFTs</p></li><li><p>He goes on a discord channel and finds a willing trade partner</p></li><li><p>P alleges a third party trading service was needed to complete the trade, P wanted to use NFT Trader.io, other side agrees.</p></li><li><p>“A few minutes” after agreeing to the trade, the other side says he uploaded the Cool Cats to the website, and he just needs P to upload the MAYCs and complete the transaction. Other side sends P a link to the NFT Trader website.</p></li><li><p>P thought it was the real website, it wasn’t</p></li><li><p>He uploads, and clicks to approve the transfer, nothing happens, he clicks multiple times more, then he notices his ETH in his wallet is lower than expected, he checks the wallet, and BAYC and MAYC are gone.</p></li><li><p>Turns out the website was fake, every time he clicked to complete the transaction, he was allowing access to his wallet</p></li><li><p>He tries to tell Open Sea in order to prevent the re-sale, does the same on discord, reaches out to BAYC on discord, they tell him sorry and will try to help with Open Sea</p></li><li><p>4 hours after they are stolen, they are all re-sold on open sea</p></li><li><p>It appears they were then later sold on LooksRare</p></li><li><p>New owners will not give them back unless they are paid what they lost</p></li><li><p>Complaint goes on to detail many other similar situations, complains of lack of gov regulations</p></li></ul></li><li><p>CAUSES OF ACTION</p><ul><li><p>Alleges OpenSeas grew too fast, not sufficient security protocols, same w LooksRare, says BAYC doesn’t do anything to prevent this</p></li><li><p>Negligence as to OS and LR – not maintaining the database for stolen items, not sufficient customer service</p><ul><li><p>Points to media interviews about OS admitting they have an “obligation” as to security</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Negligence as to BAYC – not monitoring the community for stolen items</p></li><li><p>Negligent supervision and training and negligent hiring as to OS and LR</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Discuss SIM SWAP cases</p><ul><li><p>What is a sim swap</p></li><li><p>How do they happen</p></li><li><p>Causes of action</p></li><li><p>Arbitration</p></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong><em>"May It Please The Internet" </em></strong><em>is a podcast brought to you by: </em><strong><em><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a>, </em></strong><em>lawyers who represent businesses who make money online.</em> </p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/460350</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/460350/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220419_030402_d2133fb3efb243f1c41a2b2283e092d8.mp3" length="32041087" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">393ee2c4-de5f-4dbf-9195-db5890eb4b71</guid>
      <itunes:duration>2003</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 04:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/460350/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT)]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT)]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this episode, Eric and John explain what Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) are, the utility of NFT, and more importantly, the legal issues surrounding NFT. It's just a .jpg, right?</p><p>Show Outline:</p><p>Part 1- Legal Stuff in the News/More lighthearted discussion – of course lots of NFT stuff</p><ul><li><p>Nike <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/2/10/22925252/nike-stockx-shoe-lawsuit-vault-nft-trademark-infringement">sues</a> StockX for its Vault collection of NFTs relating to Nike shoes</p><ul><li><p>Now there is <a href="https://hypebeast.com/2022/2/john-geiger-turns-nike-lawsuit-into-nft-release-info">another</a> NFT project about the lawsuit</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Miramax <a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/tarantino-miramax-pulp-fiction-nft-1235052378/">sues</a> Tarantino for NFT project re Pulp Fiction script.</p></li><li><p>Jay Z <a href="https://www.thefashionlaw.com/roc-a-fellas-nft-lawsuit-and-a-look-at-how-royalties-works/">sues</a> Dam Dash</p></li><li><p>Hitpiece NFT website</p></li><li><p>Our own experience with NFTs</p></li></ul><p>May It Please The Internet is a Podcast brought to you by Revision Legal. For more information visit <strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/452295</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/452295/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220412_020436_933da0bf13e0c9fc75c6f6b94864715a.mp3" length="22824669" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c201c0c8-9459-40b2-b2fd-f2beca559c9b</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1427</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 04:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/452295/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Understanding Asset Purchase Agreements (APA Part 1)]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Understanding Asset Purchase Agreements (APA Part 1)]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this weeks episode, Eric and John break down the fundamentals of <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/services/corporate/buying-and-selling/">Asset Purchase Agreements (APA)</a>. The basics: What is it, who signs it, and what are you selling.</p><ul><li><p>What is an APA, how is different than equity</p><ul><li><p>Why APA over equity</p></li><li><p>Exceptions</p></li><li><p>Structure/format of an APA/length</p></li><li><p>How to review, where to start?</p></li></ul></li><li><p>The Parties</p><ul><li><p>Individual liability – how does this work</p></li><li><p>Who is the buyer – subsidiary? Who is paying you on deferred payments</p></li></ul></li><li><p>The Assets</p><ul><li><p>What are you selling,</p><ul><li><p>Online accounts</p></li><li><p>Inventory</p></li><li><p>IP</p></li><li><p>Data/records</p></li><li><p>Domains</p></li><li><p>Social media</p></li><li><p>Causes of action</p></li><li><p>Contracts</p></li><li><p>Goodwill</p></li></ul></li><li><p>What are you not selling</p><ul><li><p>Cash</p></li><li><p>Money in amazon account</p></li><li><p>Certain contracts</p></li><li><p>Corporate records</p></li><li><p>anything specific</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p>Parting Shot of Truth</p><ul><li><p>Getting settlements done – don’t change the terms mid-stream, it kills momentum and credibility</p></li></ul><p><strong>May It Please The Internet</strong> is a PODcast brought to you by <strong>Revision Legal</strong>. For more information and legal advice, visit <strong><a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></strong></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/443925</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/443925/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220404_090405_5e897f24b1703a6f4d71db39f838cc36.mp3" length="41669821" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b2043b1-fc87-478e-9c09-6da9cd71000d</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1737</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 04:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/443925/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Getting Your Business Ready To Sell]]></title>
      <itunes:title><![CDATA[Getting Your Business Ready To Sell]]></itunes:title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John Di Giacomo and Eric Misterovich open the <strong>Revision Legal Podcast: <em>May It Please The Internet</em></strong> series with a discussion about getting your business ready for sale. They dive into eCommerce, economies of scale and large roll-up funds.</p><p></p><p><strong>Show Outline:</strong></p><p>a. Take a hard look at your business, what is sloppy?</p><p>b. Getting books in order</p><p>i. Knowing your landed costs of inventory without question</p><p>1. Including any customs fees</p><p>ii. Document and organize loan documents, get a personal contact with the</p><p>lender if possible</p><p>iii. Clean up internal house – operating agreement, who owns your</p><p>business, who needs to approve the sale, etc</p><p>c. Independent contractor agreements</p><p>d. Supplier contracts</p><p>e. Registering and chronicling IP</p><p>i. Make sure right entity owns it</p><p>For more information visit: <a href="https://revisionlegal.com/">RevisionLegal.com</a></p>]]></description>
      <link>https://rss.com/podcasts/mayitpleasetheinternet/436967</link>
      <enclosure url="https://content.rss.com/episodes/117518/436967/mayitpleasetheinternet/20220329_070318_63db99e141111bf3cc9bb3b50102d948.mp3" length="22117064" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7c4ebc19-a93c-4741-b2b0-0a97c8f8d758</guid>
      <itunes:duration>1383</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
      <podcast:season>1</podcast:season>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:50:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://transcripts.rss.com/117518/436967/transcript" type="application/x-subrip"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>