Introduction – Duration 1:00

• Introduces me and the topic of standarized testing. Very short and just uses some sarcasm to give this episode direction with respect to the topic.

Topic #1 – Duration 2:00 – 3:00

• Main point: History and impact of standardized testing in the United States, particularly in the context of public education.

• Supporting point: Influence of the government in mandating standardized testing, its implications for educational policy, and the unintended consequences of this testing approach

• Source: (Salinas, J. & Guajardo, C. (2022). A review of Standardized Testing and its relevance to public education).

Topic #2 – Duration 2:00 – 3:00

• Main point: Counter my own argument by talking about how standardized tests establish a uniform standard for evaluating student achievement and their overall importance in the educational system, particularly in the United States.

• Refutation: Refute the counterargument by pointing out fallacies in the system such as its uniformity and its non-holistic design

• Source: Tunnel, Lisa. “Standardized Tests: The Benefits and Impacts of Implementing Standardized Tests.”

Topic #3 – Duration 1:00 – 2:00

• Main point: Discuss possible alternatives to standardized testing. Probably add some sarcasm in there.

• Source: Neill, Monty, and Bob Peterson. “Alternatives to Standardized Tests - Rethinking Schools.”

Closing – Duration 0:30 – 1:00

• summarize how standardized tests are too uniform and lack personality, how this is a double-edged sword, but also mention how it is an essential tool that has worked for a long time and changing it, while recommended, will require a massive effort. Maybe a meme to end it?