One of those centers received a subpoena demanding ten years of private donor records.

No complaints had been filed. No fraud had been alleged.

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously in the pregnancy center's favor.

Twenty-four hours later, the state found a way to keep fighting anyway.

That is just one case.

In New York and California, attorneys general are trying to silence pregnancy centers for simply telling women that abortion pill reversal exists. In Louisiana, a woman's ex-boyfriend ordered mifepristone online and coerced her to take it. And the drug whose label says one in twenty-five women will end up in the emergency room is now available to anyone with a few minutes and an internet connection.

Gabriella McIntyre is an attorney with the Alliance Defending Freedom. She joins Dear Jane to walk through all of it, the cases, the creative tactics, the real stories behind the headlines, and answer the question most people are left with at the end:

What can the rest of us actually do about any of this?

Shaun Freeborn of Tradies for Babies joins Scott and Marcie to talk about what he calls one of the biggest lies young couples are told: that abortion will let them keep living the life they want.

For Shaun, that belief is personal. He and his wife had an abortion when they were 17. Years later, they still carry lasting regret and have turned that pain into a mission to help other men understand the role they can play when a woman is facing an abortion decision.

Shaun also shares how Tradies for Babies grew from tradesmen and blue-collar workers speaking up online into a grassroots movement with videos coming in from around the world. For many of them, it is the first time they have had a public place to talk about abortion, responsibility, and even their own grief.

The conversation also moves into abortion laws in Australia, the backlash men can face for speaking publicly, and why Shaun believes changing someone’s mind may require something more than the right argument. If abortion was supposed to help them move on with their lives, why is it the one decision they regret every day?

Today, more than 8,000 babies are estimated to be alive following abortion pill reversal, and APR is now offered through networks in countries around the world.

Delgado explains how the protocol works, what the research shows, and why he believes some of the evidence used to challenge APR may actually support it He also discusses ACOG’s opposition, the criticism he has faced, and why the debate over APR has persisted for more than a decade.

At the center of it all is one question: If a woman changes her mind after taking the first abortion drug, why should she not be given the chance to try to continue her pregnancy?

Andrea Trudden, Vice President of Communications and Marketing at Heartbeat International, joins Scott and Marcie to discuss what the organization calls abortion pill poisoning: documented cases in which women have allegedly been given abortion drugs through force, coercion, or deception.

Pills crushed into drinks. Orders placed using a woman’s identity. A doctor accused of poisoning his girlfriend. And a father charged with giving abortion drugs to his 17-year-old daughter at 23 weeks pregnant.

Andrea also shares the story of Catherine Herring, whose now-ex-husband was convicted after secretly giving her abortion drugs and attempting to do so six more times.

Heartbeat International now maintains a public tracker of these cases, documenting each through court records or local news reports.

The abortion pill debate usually centers on access. But when these drugs are this easy to obtain, who is really getting them?

Watch the full conversation on Dear Jane.

So why are more young people beginning to question it? And why now?

Lydia Taylor Davis, a spokesperson and Social Media Coordinator for Students for Life of America who once identified as pro-choice herself, joins Scott and Marcie to talk about what she is seeing firsthand on college campuses: young men becoming more engaged, young women proving harder to reach, and students reconsidering abortion after encountering arguments they had never heard before.

But those conversations come at a cost.

Lydia says she wears a bulletproof vest when she speaks on campuses and received threats after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Students for Life considered canceling its speaking tours.

They didn’t.

She also discusses what the pro-life movement gets wrong when speaking to women, why graphic abortion imagery can backfire, and why social media may be one of the most important battlegrounds left.

All of these facts paint a picture and also raise an important question: what actually changes a person's mind about abortion?

Watch the full conversation on Dear Jane.

Chapters:

0:44 — Campus Trends on Abortion

2:25 — What’s Changing Gen Z’s Mind?

3:40 — The Gender Divide on Abortion

6:06 — What’s Bringing Men Into the Conversation?

7:11 — “Charlie Was First. We’re Coming for You Next.”

8:44 — Why They Refused to Back Down

10:22 — Who Is Actually Changing Their Mind?

11:53 — How Do You Prepare for the Threats?

13:32 — Is the Pro-Life Argument Really Religious?

15:28 — When Becoming Pro-Life Changes Your Identity

17:59 — What Isn’t Working With Gen Z?

20:11 — Does Victim Imagery Work?

22:06 — How Social Media Shapes Gen Z on Abortion

23:42 — Why We Have to Be Online

24:42 — The Social Media Post That Helped Save a Baby

25:00 — Who Is Gen Z Listening To?

A new study grouped measures like these under one category: abortion restrictions and linked states with more restrictions to higher maternal mortality.

That sounds alarming. But Dr. Christina Francis, a board-certified OB-GYN and CEO of AAPLOG, raises a basic question: how do these policies actually cause maternal deaths?

She joins Scott and Marcie to examine what the headline leaves out. How does requiring an ultrasound increase maternal mortality? Why is giving a woman more time before a major decision treated as a health risk? And why is physician involvement being framed as a restriction?

The conversation also turns to abortion-pill complications, including research finding that 83.5% of post-abortion-pill emergency room visits were miscoded as miscarriages and 76% of emergency room visits following the abortion pill were coded as severe.

Dr. Francis explains why those findings matter, what could happen as physician-only requirements are removed, and the challenges doctors face when they question the dominant abortion narrative within medicine.

Watch the full episode of Dear Jane to get the full conversation.

--

1:15 — When Maternal-Fetal Medicine Chooses a Side

3:27 — Do Abortion Restrictions Cause Maternal Deaths?

5:08 — Is a Waiting Period Really a Health Risk?

6:12 — How Does an Ultrasound Cause Maternal Death?

9:15 — What Actually Causes Maternal Death?

10:19 — 80% of Maternal Deaths Are Preventable

12:49 — When Pregnancy Isn’t the Cause

14:23 — Should Non-Physicians Provide Abortions?

16:20 — The Reality of a D&E Abortion

19:22 — How Safe Is the Abortion Pill?

22:00 — When an Abortion Is Coded as a Miscarriage

23:05 — The Trauma No One Warns Women About

23:50 — What Pro-Life Doctors Risk by Speaking Up

24:45 — 93% of OB-GYNs Don’t Perform Abortions

25:58 — Who Stands With Pro-Life Doctors?

Once taken, the abortion drug and biological remnants from the abortion enter a toilet, a sewer system, and eventually a wastewater treatment facility that was never designed to remove every pharmaceutical compound.

The chemical is only part of what enters the system. Liberty Counsel Action estimates that 30 to 40 tons of hazardous medical waste, including human remains, are being flushed into American waterways.

That makes mifepristone different from the other pharmaceuticals already raising concerns in the water supply. It was developed and FDA-approved to end a life in the womb by blocking progesterone, the hormone needed to sustain a pregnancy.

But does that anti-progesterone activity disappear once the drug enters the water system?

Issues in Law & Medicine,a study reported anti-progesterone activity in environmental water samples from Austin, Texas; Blacksburg, Virginia; and Carbondale, Illinois. The study does not establish that exposure through drinking water causes infertility, nor does it determine where the anti-progesterone activity originated. But it raises a question that has received remarkably little investigation: what happens after mifepristone enters the water system?

They also found that downstream levels were not appreciably lower than upstream levels in any of the three cities. In two, they were higher. The authors concluded that conventional water treatment was not consistently effective at removing the activity they detected.cking progesterone, what happens after it enters the water system?Could environmental exposure be one factor worth investigating when approximately 1 in 6 people of reproductive age worldwide experience infertility during their lifetime?Abigail Forman is a researcher and policy analyst with Liberty Counsel Action and the author of a comprehensive analysis on abortion drugs in America's water supply. She joins Dear Jane to walk through what the abortion industry and federal regulators have largely left unaddressed.

Abigail Forman is a researcher and policy analyst with Liberty Counsel Action and the author of a comprehensive analysis on abortion drugs in America's water supply. She joins Dear Jane to walk through the research, explain what she believes the abortion industry and federal regulators have largely left unaddressed, and discuss why these questions deserve closer attention.

She also raises a question that stops the conversation cold: if women were required to decide whether to cremate or bury what the abortion pill produces, would more of them think twice?

Her argument reaches beyond the pro-life movement. You do not have to be pro-life to care about abortion drugs entering the water supply. And because chemical abortions account for roughly two-thirds of abortions in the United States, Abigail argues that water-contamination regulations could change the abortion landscape almost overnight.

the abortion pill now accounts for roughly two0-thirds of abortions in the Uni

Visit abortioninourwater.org to learn more about the research and current efforts calling on the EPA to investigate. The comment period closes August 31, 2026.

Watch the full episode of Dear Jane.

Scott and Marcie discuss the Massachusetts bill that would allow abortion up to birth and the question it raises about messaging: As the movement has shifted its focus toward the mother, has it made a strategic mistake by stepping back from talking about the baby? They discuss fetal pain—what it is, how it shapes the conversation, and why some in the movement have moved away from talking about it.

They also examine the California lawsuit in which the state's attorney general is seeking more than $20 million and a permanent gag order against Heartbeat International and Real Options for telling women about Abortion Pill Reversal. Under oath, the state's own expert witness could not say APR is unsafe, could not say it does not work, and could not support the state's claim that the abortion pill is safer than Tylenol.

These conversations are shaping the future of the pro-life movement and raising questions it can no longer avoid.

Watch the full episode of Dear Jane.

--

0:23 — Abortion Up to Birth

1:49 — Have We Abandoned the Baby?

3:30 — The Fetal Pain Argument

4:16 — The Baby Recoils

5:40 — The Problem With Subjectivism

6:50 — Reorienting Around the Baby

7:54 — What's Your Favorite Type of Abortion?

9:34 — Equal Protection Explained

11:00 — Inside the Movement's Divide

13:14 — Unapologetic About the Goal

14:12 — Is the Movement Making It Worse?

15:00 — Abortion Is Illegal. It's Still Happening.

17:10 — History Doesn't Answer 2026

19:30 — Showing What Abortion Actually Is

20:00 — The California Lawsuit

21:00 — Coercion and the Feminist Silence

21:50 — The Baby Who Almost Wasn't

22:40 — The Witness Who Couldn't Back It Up

23:50 — Population Control on the Stand

24:40 — What If We Just Called It Progesterone?

26:00 — APR Is a Choice

27:00 — Taking Away the Right to Change Your Mind

It is happening one sentence at a time, buried inside 80-page bills that most lawmakers never fully read, drafted by legal bodies most people have never heard of, and framed as routine updates to reflect the modern reality of family life.

Patience Sunne, Engagement Director at Them Before Us, has been reading those bills. She joins Dear Jane to talk about what is actually in them: the removal of mother and father language from parentage laws, the legalization of surrogacy without a single background check, the quiet allowance of poly parenting slipped into a single line of code, and what any of it means for the child at the center of all of it.

Them Before Us recently released the Children's Rights Scorecard, grading all 50 states on how well their laws protect children's rights. You can look up your state. The grades are illuminating.

This is not a conversation about politics. It is a conversation about what children need and whether anyone in power is asking.

Watch the full episode on Dear Jane.

Naomi Padilla spent four years inside a Tampa abortion clinic where, she says, surgical suites were wiped down with a household cleaner, women were processed like cattle, and the words baby and God weren't allowed to be spoken.

A woman who said she wasn't sure was still ushered through the abortion process.

A woman who called back, saying she was on the brink of taking her own life, received no emergency intervention. No one called 911.

And the number of procedures completed determined whether the staff got pizza or “the good lunch.”

When Naomi later met former abortion workers from across the country, she realized her clinic was not an isolated case. More than 700 workers have connected with And Then There Were None, many of whom have described similar experiences.

Then one day, a patient offered her $50 just to hear her baby’s heartbeat.

Naomi had not heard one in two years.

Everything began to change.

Today, Naomi is part of And Then There Were None, an organization that helps abortion workers leave the industry and begin healing. She joins Dear Jane to tell the story of what she witnessed, what finally changed her mind, and why she believes her story is only one of many.

Emma Waters has spent years asking that question. A researcher at the Heritage Foundation and the author of the forthcoming book, Rethinking Fertility, she joins Dear Jane to talk about the 1.5 million frozen embryos currently in storage across the United States, human beings suspended in time, some for decades, and the fertility industry that created them with fragmented regulatory oversight.

Emma breaks down how genetic screening allows parents to test embryos for everything from Down syndrome to IQ, personality traits, and male pattern baldness, selecting which lives continue and which are destroyed. She also covers a federal class action lawsuit filed in California in 2025, where a woman destroyed her last remaining embryos based on a 98% reliability statistic that turned out to be scientifically unsupported.

And she asks the harder question underneath all of it: how did a $35 billion industry with the power to make these decisions end up answering to almost no one?

Anton Krecic left political fundraising convinced that policy alone wasn't enough to end abortion. So he started Seven Weeks Coffee, named after a question his wife asked: When is a baby the size of a coffee bean? The answer is at seven weeks, the same point when a heartbeat can often be detected on ultrasound. The mission followed naturally: give 10% of every sale to pregnancy care centers and build it unapologetically pro-life from day one.

Nearly $2 million in donations later, he joins Dear Jane to talk about boldness in the marketplace, what the parable of the talents can teach entrepreneurs, and why the pro-life movement needs more Christians building businesses. He also weighs in on the difference between being humble and passivity, the importance of unifying within the pro-life movement, and how he would respond if Starbucks came calling.

Timestamps:

1:00 — The Idea Behind Seven Weeks: Mission, Name, and Giving Back

4:50 — From Political Fundraising to Pro-Life Business

7:40 — Why For-Profit Can Be a Force for Good

8:40 — Christians in the Marketplace: Excellence as a Calling

10:13 — The Quality Behind the Coffee: Sourcing and Standards

11:30 — Advice for Mission-Driven Entrepreneurs

15:00 — What Holds Christians Back from Bold Business

16:30 — Prioritizing Pro-Life Partners in Business

18:40 — There Is a Market for Values

19:30 — Be Proud, Be Bold, Be Unapologetic

23:40 — Unity Over Division: Navigating Internal Pro-Life Debates

26:06 — Fake Reviews and the Overwhelming Pro-Life Response

27:30 — What Is Next for Seven Weeks Coffee

28:25 — What Anton Would Say to Starbucks

Emily Berning of Let Them Live has seen it firsthand: when you remove the financial pressure, the isolation, and the panic, 98% of abortion-minded women choose life. Not because they were lectured or given platitudes, but because someone actually met their needs.

In this episode, Emily breaks down what a true funded alternative to abortion looks like: immediate support, mid-term stability, long-term independence. She makes the case that the pro-life movement can't only fight to end abortion without funding the alternative. The church, employers—and yes, even the government—all have a role to play.

This isn't a theoretical solution. It's happening right now. And it works.

If you're pro-life and you're serious about saving lives, this conversation will inspire and challenge how you think about what "winning" actually requires.

The Ridgway's viral announcement sparked a much bigger conversation about abortion, disability, and the sinister role of eugenics in abortion decisions.

In this episode, we talk about why a Down syndrome diagnosis so often changes how parents decide the value of their child’s life. We also expose what happens when technology is used to identify genetic conditions before birth and abortion becomes the expected next step being pushed relentlessly by doctors.

Our conversation isn't just about one influencer's tragic abortion decision. It is about the growing pressure to decide who is worth welcoming into the world based on a test result.

This video dives into a candid and often intense abortion debate, exploring differing views on the value of unborn life and the concept of abortion as health care. We respond to some of the most revealing, frustrating, and widely repeated reactions to recent episodes, then turn to the growing debate over equal protection and whether pregnancy help centers could be affected by mandatory reporting laws.

Scott and Marcie discuss:

◼ Why abortion regret may be a weaker pro-life argument than many people realize

◼ What happens when human value is based on intelligence, ability, or personhood

◼ What a new legal memo says about equal protection and pregnancy help centers

◼ Whether enforcement concerns are enough to reject equal protection legislation

◼ Why one of the hosts says she is slowly moving toward equal protection

EQUAL PROTECTION MEMORANDUM: https://faa.app.box.com/v/PHC-reporting

Follow The Dear Jane Podcast:

Website - https://dearjane.org

Instagram - https://instagram.com/dearjanepodcast

Facebook - https://facebook.com/dearjanepodcast

In Part 2 of our equal protection series, Breanne joins Marcie and Scott to make her case, from the terminology people get wrong, to the line between pressure and coercion, to what it would actually mean to treat abortion the way we treat any other taking of life. It's an honest, uncomfortable, real-world conversation about one of the most divisive questions inside the pro-life movement, told by someone who has lived both sides of it.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Breanne Houston helps lead Alliance Family Services and is launching a new pro-life clinic in Lenoir City, Tennessee, serving women facing unexpected pregnancies with free ultrasounds, abortion pill reversal, and long-term support. https://www.alliancefamilyservices.org/

WHAT WE GET INTO

What "equal protection" really means, and why the words matter

The difference between pressure and coercion

How prosecuting women would affect pregnancy centers and abortion pill reversal.

Whether it would drive abortion further into the dark, or stop it

The committee room moment that crystallized all of it for Breanne

Drawing from her own story and years of working with post-abortive women, Victoria unpacks the role of coercion, shame, guilt, and accountability in the abortion debate.

In this episode:

-Why Victoria opposes criminalizing women for abortion

-What coercion really looks like behind abortion decisions

-How guilt shapes the experience of post-abortive women

-Whether criminalization would actually protect preborn children

🎙️ Guest: Victoria Robinson — post-abortive advocate and spokesperson for women navigating life after abortion

📌 This is Part 1 of 2. Next week, hear the other side: post-abortive leader Breanne Houston explains why she now believes criminalization IS necessary to protect preborn children. Subscribe so you don't miss it.

🎧 Listen to Dear Jane wherever you get your podcasts.

📩 Have a story to share? Reach out at https://dearjane.org/

Olivia Summer, Senior Litigation Counsel with the ACLJ, exposes the legal loopholes, redefined language, and blocked investigations that critics argue allow born-alive infants to die without consequence.

⚠️ To be clear: Infanticide is illegal in all 50 states. This episode examines whether legal changes are creating dangerous gaps that allow born-alive infants to die without investigation or consequence.

In this episode:

• What "infanticide" actually means and what it doesn't

• The difference between "comfort care" and lifesaving medical care for abortion survivors

• How legal language around "perinatal" death is being rewritten

• Why investigations into infant deaths are being blocked

• The rise of unsupervised abortion pill use and its deadly consequences

• What happens to babies who are born alive after failed abortions

👇 Resources

Website: American Center for Law and Justice

YouTube: youtube.com/@OfficialACLJ

Instagram: instagram.com/acljofficial

Facebook: facebook.com/theACLJ

X: x.com/ACLJ

🔔 Subscribe & turn on notifications!

A newly released DOJ report is raising serious questions about how the FACE Act was used and whether pro-life Americans were unfairly targeted.

At the same time, troubling stories out of Canada show patients being encouraged toward euthanasia, even before receiving a full diagnosis.

Also, during a recent congressional hearing, one simple question about abortion stopped the conversation cold.

Scott and Marcie walk through these stories, what is being said, what is not, and why it all matters right now.

Subscribe to Dear Jane for weekly conversations you will not hear anywhere else.

James Talarico, Texas Senate candidate and self-described Christian, has made waves by claiming the Bible supports abortion and a woman's right to choose. It's a bold claim. But does it hold up under scrutiny?

In this episode, Scott and Marcie bring in Pastor Bryan Wolfmueller of Austin, Texas, to do what politicians rarely do: look carefully at what the biblical texts actually say. They walk through Talarico's specific claims, examine the passages he's citing, and explore what faithful biblical interpretation really looks like when the stakes are this high.

If you've ever wondered how to respond when Scripture gets invoked in the political and cultural wars, this episode is for you.

Find Pastor Wolfmueller online:

Website: https://wolfmueller.co/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@PastorBryanWolfmueller

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bryanwolfmueller/

Substack: https://whatnot.substack.com/

X: https://x.com/bwolfmueller

Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/wolfmueller/

What does this mean for unborn children, women, and the future of pro-life efforts in Virginia?

In this episode, we cover:

– The real impact of the Virginia abortion amendment

– What “abortion rights” in the constitution actually means

– Messaging strategies that could shift public opinion

– How the pro-life movement can respond effectively in 2026

– Resources needed to fight back against abortion expansion

If you're concerned about late-term abortion, constitutional amendments, and protecting life, this is a conversation you don’t want to miss.

Subscribe for more pro-life news, abortion policy updates, and real conversations that matter.

Guest Socials:

Website: https://virginiaforprebornjustice.com/

Substack: @virginiaforprebornjustice

Instagram: @va4prebornjustice

TikTok: @va4prebornjustice

Facebook: @va4prebornjustice

X: @va4prebornjust

With millions of women having taken Mifepristone since 2000, hundreds of thousands have reportedly been sent to emergency rooms, raising serious questions. The episode ends with a disturbing account from a former Planned Parenthood worker who claims the organization sets abortion quotas and pressures women into abortion.

👇 Follow Dear Jane & stay in the conversation

🌐 dearjane.org

📸 instagram.com/dearjanepodcast

📘 facebook.com/dearjanepodcast

Website: https://senate.texas.gov/member.php?d=1

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BryanHughesTX

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bryanhughestx

X: https://x.com/BryanHughesTX

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BryanHughesTX

On this episode, we sit down with attorney and life issues analyst Nicole Hunt to examine how certain storybooks introduce complex adult themes to children under the language of empowerment and personal freedom.

They discuss:

• How messaging aimed at young readers can shape beliefs early

• Why some activists are focusing on children’s media

• The language used in modern storybooks to frame difficult decisions

• What this trend could mean for the next generation

Is this simply storytelling, or something more intentional?

Watch the full conversation as they unpack the messaging behind the pages and the growing debate about what children are being taught through modern media.

Then they head north to New York, where lawmakers in this deep-blue state have introduced a slate of bills that will make your head spin. From targeting pregnancy help centers (again), to shielding abortion data from insurance oversight, and eliminating state-sponsored travel to pro-life states, these proposals raise serious questions about transparency and just how far abortion extremism is driving public policy.

👇 Follow Dear Jane & stay in the conversation

🌐 dearjane.org

📸 instagram.com/dearjanepodcast

📘 facebook.com/dearjanepodcast

In this episode, Nelly Roach, Founder and CEO of Choose Life Marketing, explains how Olive engages women at the exact moment they search for abortion online. Instead of being funneled exclusively toward abortion providers, women encounter immediate, private, life-affirming support and direct connection to local pregnancy centers.

This conversation covers:

• How abortion-related search traffic shapes decisions

• Why AI matters in digital abortion outreach

• What early engagement data is revealing

• How pregnancy centers can compete in a search-driven culture

• The ethical debate surrounding pro-life technology

Abortion is no longer only a legal or political fight. It is a digital one. Search engines, online ads, and AI-driven tools influence outcomes long before a woman walks into a clinic.

Olive was built to operate in that space with precision and scale. If you care about pro-life strategy, digital marketing, pregnancy center growth, and the future of life-affirming outreach, this episode is essential.

Learn more about Choose Life Marketing: https://www.chooselifemarketing.com/

Follow:

https://www.facebook.com/chooselifemarketing

https://www.instagram.com/chooselifemarketing/

Subscribe for more conversations at the intersection of technology, culture, and the pro-life movement.

Stick around as Scott puts AI to the test. Can ChatGPT guess his worldview? Insightful, thought-provoking, and a must-watch for anyone wanting to understand the bigger picture behind life issues.

🔗 Megan’s Website: https://meganalmon.com/

🔗 Stand to Reason: https://www.str.org/

📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/standtoreason/

▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/STRvideos

📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/standtoreason93

In this episode of Dear Jane, Scott and Marcie sit down with Karen Czarnecki, Executive Director of the Charlotte Lozier Institute, to unpack the findings of the National Pregnancy Center Report.

We discuss:

• How pregnancy centers measure real impact

• What services women are actually receiving

• How centers maintain integrity and transparency

• The role they play in communities nationwide

The conversation goes beyond headlines and into data, stories, and measurable outcomes. If support changes decisions, this episode matters.

👇 Follow Dear Jane & stay in the conversation

🌐 dearjane.org

📸 instagram.com/dearjanepodcast

📘 facebook.com/dearjanepodcast

Dear Jane is back for 2026, and Part 2 of this two-part conversation goes straight into one of the most uncomfortable debates inside the pro-life movement. Hosts Scott and Marcie sit down with Clark Forsythe of Americans United for Life to unpack why holding women legally responsible isn’t as simple—or as effective—as some think.

They talk honestly about what’s changed in a post–abortion pill world, why self-managed abortions complicate everything, and which laws actually reduce abortion versus the ones that sound strong but miss the mark. This isn’t theory. It’s history, law, and real-world consequences—all on the table.

If you’ve ever wondered where accountability should land, how women are truly impacted, or where the movement goes from here… this episode is for you.

Guest: Clark Forsythe, Senior Counsel, Americans United for Life

🔗 aul.org

Facebook: Americans United for Life

X: @aul

This episode tackles hard questions about justice, deterrence, and whether current laws are actually ending abortion. Next week, Scott and Marcie return with Clark Forsythe of Americans United for Life to make the case against criminalization in Part 2.

Guest: Bradley Pierce – President, Foundation to Abolish Abortion

Guest Socials:

Website: https://faa.life/

Facebook: / abolitionistfaa

Instagram: / abolitionistfaa

X: https://x.com/AbolitionistFAA

YouTube: / @abolitionistfaa

In this episode, Peter Breen from the Thomas More Society breaks down the legal threats facing pro-life efforts and how they're fighting back. It's a clear look at the battle ahead and how the movement plans to win.

To support the vital work of the Thomas More Society, please visit: https://www.thomasmoresociety.org/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thomasmoresoc/

X: https://x.com/ThomasMoreSoc

YouTube: https://www.prolifepastors.org/

Rich Bennett, President and CEO of Life Network in Colorado Springs, joins us to reveal what it’s like to run a pro-life pregnancy center in a state that’s become a magnet for out-of-state abortions. As abortion pills flood Colorado, Rich shares how his team is holding the line — adapting, innovating, and offering hope where it’s needed most. This is the frontlines of the life movement. Don’t miss this raw and powerful conversation from ground zero in the abortion debate.

Website: www.lablackadvocates.com

Instagram: www.instagram.com/lablackadvocates

Facebook: www.facebook.com/lablackadvocates#prolifenews

In a culture saturated with soundbites and polarization, Emily offers a thoughtful, truth-driven approach to navigating even the toughest pro-choice arguments — without compromising clarity or compassion. If you’ve ever hesitated to speak up, felt unsure what to say, or feared doing more harm than good, this episode will give you the confidence and tools to engage with conviction.

Website: https://equalrightsinstitute.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/equal_rights_institute/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@EqualRightsInstitute/shorts

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EqualRightsInstitute X: https://x.com/GeigerEmilyA

Learn More

Website: https://mayrarodriguez.org/en_us/

Linkt.ree: https://linktr.ee/RMayra

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRealMayraRodriguez/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/therealmayra.rodriguez/

X: https://x.com/TheRealMayraRdz

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/@mayrarodriguezpslam18

In today’s debates over abortion, IVF, marriage, and family, the focus is often on the desires of adults. But what about the rights and well-being of children? On this episode of Dear Jane, Katy Faust, Founder and President of Them Before Us, challenges us to rethink how we understand and protect children’s rights. She shares why every child has a right to their mother and father—and how prioritizing adult wants over children’s needs comes at a serious cost. From family structure to bioethics, this conversation explores how a truly pro-life worldview puts children first.

Them Before Us Website: https://thembeforeus.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/them_before_us/ https://www.instagram.com/katyfaustofficial/ X: https://x.com/ThemBeforeUs YT: https://www.youtube.com/@thembeforeus9515 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThemBeforeUs/

From the alarming loss rates of frozen embryos to the shocking parallels between past medical abuses—like the Tuskegee Experiment—and today’s treatment of unborn life, we’re diving deep into the ethical crisis shaping reproductive medicine. Is IVF truly the best path forward, or is there a better alternative that respects both life and human dignity?

Join Dr. Francis as she explores the growing field of restorative reproductive medicine, the disturbing pressure on doctors to conform to pro-abortion narratives, and the urgent need to reclaim the medical profession from ideological capture.

Website: Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising

Instagram: @paaunow

X: @paaunow

Facebook: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1CQUcM8if5F04rVIgHWs0w

Website: https://www.newwavefeminists.com/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/NewWaveFeminists/ IG: https://www.instagram.com/newwavefeminists/?hl=en X: https://x.com/NWFproTX

Seven Weeks Coffee: https://sevenweekscoffee.com/

Watch this episode on youtube: https://youtu.be/-qSMLRJy98E?si=6ai4_gWlZ61iHH2R

- The truth behind the pro-life message

- Why the "humanity of the unborn" is so controversial

- Abolition vs. Incrementalism: Which approach aligns with our morals?

Don’t miss this powerful conversation. Understand the issues, sharpen your stance, and join the debate that’s shaping our future. Learn more: https://youtube.com/@thecaseforlife?si=IT0JNJI2Pqm7aTws

In this episode, we’re joined by Sarah Bowen and Shawn Zierke—experts in PRCs, coalition-building, and policy-making. Tune in to discover how PRCs could reshape policies to truly empower women.

From medical negligence and patient privacy violations to improper screenings and lack of post-op care, we uncover how these failures put women’s lives at risk. Tune in to learn about the widespread problems that go unchecked and what must be done to protect women.

Our guest, Raúl Reyes, author of The African Awakening, joins us to discuss how abortion rates and reasons differ from those in countries like the USA and uncover the challenges and opportunities for pregnancy centers and churches in Africa to make a meaningful impact.

Today we sit down with Emily Cappello and Michele Sterlace Accorsi from Feminists Choosing Life of New York.

Michele and Emily are on a mission to shift the current cultural narrative that equates feminism to abortion rights.

They share what it’s like pro-life feminists in New York as they work to create equal opportunities for women and their children, born and unborn.

Today we sit down with Allan Parker, Norma McCorvey’s attorney for over a decade and author of Reversing Roe V. Wade: My Journey with Roe, Doe and God. Allan shares the fascinating story of Norma McCorvey’s change of heart and how God called him to represent Norma in an effort overturn Roe v. Wade.

You can read more about Herb and his work: Rehumanize Website: Rehumanize International, Rehumanize on Facebook, Rehumanize on Instagram, Rehumanize on Twitter, Rehumanize on YouTube, and Herb's Twitter.

Herb joined the Rehumanize team in 2016 as a summer intern while studying rhetoric and politics at the University of Pittsburgh and has been working in some capacity for the organization since then. When the founder stepped down in 2020, the Board of Directors chose Herb to fill the role of Executive Director.

Throughout the years, Herb’s unique position as a politically independent pro-life atheist has broken down barriers to reach demographics often untapped by the mainstream pro-life movement. Similarly, Herb’s common ground on the abortion issue with many folks on the political right has enabled productive outreach on the issues of war, torture, and the death penalty.

Herb is a passionate and engaging advocate for the Consistent Life Ethic who has a passion for building bridges and finding common ground with people across the political spectrum to call everyone to greater consistency in the fight for human rights. If you would like to book a speaking engagement, please visit rehumanizeintl.org/events for more information.

Learn more: https://problackprolife.com/

https://dearjane.org

Jess Ford and Marcie Little are the co-hosts of the upcoming podcast, Zoe, a place to equip GenZ (and others) on how to think about the pro-life issue and how to engage in meaningful conversations on the topics of life and abortion.

This group exists as a space for non-religious people to do pro-life work. They put forward secular arguments to defend the pro-life position, and work with anyone willing to take a stand against abortion to promote their pro-life mission.

Tune in to hear our conversations with pro-life leaders from all walks of life and backgrounds.

Learn more: www.dearjane.org