Extremism is not an objective psychological state but a label defined by its distance from a shifting "social consensus" or the "ordinary". In conflict settings, dominant power groups frequently label the direct, episodic violence of low-power groups (e.g., suicide bombings) as "extreme" while framing their own structural or institutionalized violence (e.g., state-sanctioned torture or "shock and awe") as normative defense. From a socialist framework, true democratic participation is often blocked for marginalized groups, leading them to adopt "extreme" measures as a perceived rational strategy in a game of power.

2. The Mechanics of the Radicalization Pathway

Radicalization is a non-linear process driven by personal and social vulnerabilities rather than inherent mental illness. Scholarly consensus identifies three recurring themes: a sense of perceived injustice, a need for identity, and a need for belonging. The cognitive progression typically follows four distinct stages:

1. It's not right: Identifying an aversive condition or grievance.
2. It's not fair: Framing that condition as an injustice through comparison (relative deprivation).
3. It's your fault: Attributing the grievance to a specific target.
4. You're evil: Dehumanizing the target to eliminate psychological barriers to violence.

3. Structural Symmetries in State-Level Rhetoric

Forensic comparison between the 1939 addresses of Adolf Hitler and the 2026 briefings of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth reveals a profound symmetry in how states mobilize for "total war". Both utilize the radicalization pathway by:

• Manufacturing Grievance: Framing their respective nations as long-suffering victims of external "torture" or "savage war".
• Rejecting Legal Norms: Dismissing international treaties and "so-called international institutions" as "artificial" constraints that do not constitute "law" to them.
• Claiming Divine Mandate: Invoking "moral clarity" or "God's providence" to sanctify a "destruction-oriented" mission.
• Dehumanization: Mocking the death of leaders and dismissing civilian casualties as "squirters" to remove the naturally occurring inhibitions against human killing.